|
|||||
|
|
Berman, B. (2008). Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Business Horizons, 51, 191-199. While at one time counterfeit products were largely restricted to watches, designer apparel, and movies, today counterfeiting is a major problem in such diverse product categories as pharmaceuticals, automotive parts, and computer software. There are four distinct types of counterfeits: knockoffs, counterfeits [...] Hinduja, S., & Ingram, J. R. (2008). Self-Control and Ethical Beliefs on the Social Learning of Intellectual Property Theft. Western Criminology Review, 9(2), 52-72. Social learning theory has been identified as a strong predictor of various computer-related crimes, especially intellectual property theft (Higgins and Makin 2004; Hinduja 2006; Rogers 2001; Skinner and Fream 1997). Undoubtedly, the [...] Cremer, H., & Pierre, P. (2009). Piracy prevention and the pricing of information goods. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 34-42. This paper studies the effects of piracy on prices and welfare and determines the optimal enforcement policy. A monopolist sells an information good at a non-linear price in two versions designed for two types of consumers [...] Boyle, J. (2003). Foreword: The Opposite of Property? Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 1-32. In November of 2001, Duke University School of Law held a conference on the public domain; the “outside” of the intellectual property system, the mate- rial that is free for all to use and to build upon. 1 So far as we [...] Boyle, J. (1997). A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net? Duke Law Journal, 47. This Essay argues that we need a politics, or perhaps a political economy, of intellectual property. Using the controversy over copyright on the Internet as a case study and the history of the environmental movement as a comparison, it offers [...] Kumar, S., & Ellingson, J. (2007). Adaptive IP strategies in China: A tactical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 139-158. Purpose – The Chinese market presents numerous challenges to companies from industrialized nations, none of which is as daunting as protecting intellectual property (IP). It is necessary to develop a fresh approach for the US, EU [...] |
||||
|
Copyright © 2008 Counter (implemented by Gluji) |
|||||
