<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Counter &#187; Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.counter2010.org/tag/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.counter2010.org</link>
	<description>Counterfeiting and Piracy Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/16/strategies-to-detect-and-reduce-counterfeiting-activity/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/16/strategies-to-detect-and-reduce-counterfeiting-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controlling Outsource Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Track and Trace Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counter2010.org/?p=2617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Berman, B. (2008). Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Business Horizons, 51, 191-199.</p>
<p>While at one time counterfeit products were largely restricted to watches, designer apparel, and movies, today counterfeiting is a major problem in such diverse product categories as pharmaceuticals, automotive parts, and computer software. There are four distinct types of counterfeits: knockoffs, counterfeits [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/16/strategies-to-detect-and-reduce-counterfeiting-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Control and Ethical Beliefs on the Social Learning of Intellectual Property Theft</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/04/self-control-and-ethical-beliefs-on-the-social-learning-of-intellectual-property-theft/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/04/self-control-and-ethical-beliefs-on-the-social-learning-of-intellectual-property-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical Beliefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.counter2010.org/?p=2596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hinduja, S., &#038; Ingram, J. R. (2008). Self-Control and Ethical Beliefs on the Social Learning of Intellectual Property Theft. Western Criminology Review, 9(2), 52-72.</p>
<p>Social learning theory has been identified as a strong predictor of various computer-related crimes, especially intellectual property theft (Higgins and Makin 2004; Hinduja 2006; Rogers 2001; Skinner and Fream 1997). Undoubtedly, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/11/04/self-control-and-ethical-beliefs-on-the-social-learning-of-intellectual-property-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piracy prevention and the pricing of information goods</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/02/27/piracy-prevention-and-the-pricing-of-information-goods/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/02/27/piracy-prevention-and-the-pricing-of-information-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cremer, H., &#38; Pierre, P. (2009). Piracy prevention and the pricing of information goods. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 34-42.</p>
<p>This paper studies the effects of piracy on prices and welfare and determines the optimal enforcement policy. A monopolist sells an information good at a non-linear price in two versions designed for two types of consumers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/02/27/piracy-prevention-and-the-pricing-of-information-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreword: The Opposite of Property?</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/27/foreword-the-opposite-of-property/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/27/foreword-the-opposite-of-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Boyle, J. (2003). Foreword: The Opposite of Property? Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 1-32.</p>
<p>In November of 2001, Duke University School of Law held a conference on the public domain; the “outside” of the intellectual property system, the mate- rial that is free for all to use and to build upon. 1 So far as we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/27/foreword-the-opposite-of-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/26/a-politics-of-intellectual-property-environmentalism-for-the-net/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/26/a-politics-of-intellectual-property-environmentalism-for-the-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Boyle, J. (1997). A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net? Duke Law Journal, 47.</p>
<p>This Essay argues that we need a politics, or perhaps a political economy, of intellectual property. Using the controversy over copyright on the Internet as a case study and the history of the environmental movement as a comparison, it offers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/26/a-politics-of-intellectual-property-environmentalism-for-the-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adaptive IP strategies in China: A tactical analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/23/adaptive-ip-strategies-in-china-a-tactical-analysis/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/23/adaptive-ip-strategies-in-china-a-tactical-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Kumar, S., &#38; Ellingson, J. (2007). Adaptive IP strategies in China: A tactical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8, 139-158.</p>
<p>Purpose – The Chinese market presents numerous challenges to companies from industrialized nations, none of which is as daunting as protecting intellectual property (IP). It is necessary to develop a fresh approach for the US, EU [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/23/adaptive-ip-strategies-in-china-a-tactical-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Towards Sustainable Commons and User Access</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/10/from-consumers-to-users-shifting-the-deeper-structures-of-regulation-towards-sustainable-commons-and-user-access/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/10/from-consumers-to-users-shifting-the-deeper-structures-of-regulation-towards-sustainable-commons-and-user-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharing Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Benkler, Y. (2000). From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Towards Sustainable Commons and User Access. Federal Communications Law Journal, 52, 561-579.</p>
<p>In this paper, Benkler demonstrates that regulatory policy in the digitally networked environment is being used to replicate the current mass media structure in which individuals are passive consumers and argues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/10/from-consumers-to-users-shifting-the-deeper-structures-of-regulation-towards-sustainable-commons-and-user-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyrighting Culture. The Political Economy of Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/21/copyrighting-culture-the-political-economy-of-intellectual-property/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/21/copyrighting-culture-the-political-economy-of-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bettig, R. V. (1996). Copyrighting Culture. The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Boulder: Westview Press.</p>
<p>Introduction to the Political Economy of Intellectual Property
The political-economic theory of communications has already made a significant contribution to our understanding of mass communications and society. Denis McQuail identified three prominent trends in media business and technology that have greatly increased [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/21/copyrighting-culture-the-political-economy-of-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intellectual Property Law</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/17/intellectual-property-law/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/17/intellectual-property-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bentley, L., &#038; Sherman, B. (2001). Intellectual Property Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p>
<p>ISBN Number	0199292043</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/12/17/intellectual-property-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Friday to Sunday: the hacker ethic and shifting notions of labour, leisure and intellectual property</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/11/06/from-friday-to-sunday-the-hacker-ethic-and-shifting-notions-of-labour-leisure-and-intellectual-property/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/11/06/from-friday-to-sunday-the-hacker-ethic-and-shifting-notions-of-labour-leisure-and-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacker Ethic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leisure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brown, J. (2008). From Friday to Sunday: the hacker ethic and shifting notions of labour, leisure and intellectual property. Leisure Studies, 27, 395-409.</p>
<p>Leisure studies scholars have theorised how the Web is changing leisure experiences, and this essay continues that work by discussing the Web and shifting notions of leisure, labour and intellectual property. Much online [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/11/06/from-friday-to-sunday-the-hacker-ethic-and-shifting-notions-of-labour-leisure-and-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
