<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Counter &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.counter2010.org/tag/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.counter2010.org</link>
	<description>Counterfeiting and Piracy Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:32:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rip, Mix, Burn:  The Politics of Peer to Peer and Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/24/rip-mix-burn-the-politics-of-peer-to-peer-and-copyright-law/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/24/rip-mix-burn-the-politics-of-peer-to-peer-and-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lessig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bowrey, K., &#38; Rimmer, M. (2002). Rip, Mix, Burn: The Politics of Peer to Peer and Copyright Law. First Monday, 7.</p>
<p>Whereas Lessig&#8217;s recent work engages with questions of culture and creativity in society, this paper looks at the role of culture and creativity in the law. The paper evaluates the Napster, DeCSS, Felten and Sklyarov [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2009/01/24/rip-mix-burn-the-politics-of-peer-to-peer-and-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants</title>
		<link>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/09/22/counterfeit-purchase-intentions-role-of-lawfulness-attitudes-and-product-traits-as-determinants/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/09/22/counterfeit-purchase-intentions-role-of-lawfulness-attitudes-and-product-traits-as-determinants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterfeit Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Traits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., &#38; Kieschnick, R. L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35, 41-53.</p>
<p>This study hypothesizes that consumers&#8217; willingness to purchase counterfeit products is positively related to product performance expectations and negatively related to attitudes toward lawfulness. Support was found for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.counter2010.org/2008/09/22/counterfeit-purchase-intentions-role-of-lawfulness-attitudes-and-product-traits-as-determinants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

